Post's problem and the priority method
Simple and creative sets, the Friedberg–Muchnik theorem, a low simple set, and the Sacks splitting theorem, by finite injury priority arguments.
Post's problem asks for a c.e. set that is neither computable nor complete. The course presents Post's simple sets and why they are not many-one complete, then the finite injury priority method in three constructions: two incomparable c.e. sets (Friedberg–Muchnik), a low simple set, and the Sacks splitting theorem with its preservation strategy, with consequences for the structure of the c.e. degrees.
Contents
- 1
Simple sets and Post's problem
Post's problem; simple sets and Post's construction; productive and creative sets; simple sets are not many-one complete.
- 1.1 Simple sets
- 1.2 Productive and creative sets
- 1.3 Exercises
- 1.4 Notes and references
- 2
The Friedberg–Muchnik theorem
Two Turing incomparable c.e. sets, by the finite injury priority method; requirements, witnesses, priority and initialization.
- 2.1 The requirements
- 2.2 The construction
- 2.3 Verification
- 2.4 Exercises
- 2.5 Notes and references
- 3
A low simple set
A c.e. set that is simple and low, built by finite injury; preservation of computations by restraints; a second solution to Post's problem.
- 3.1 The requirements
- 3.2 The construction
- 3.3 Verification
- 3.4 Exercises
- 3.5 Notes and references
- 4
The Sacks splitting theorem
Splitting a c.e. set into two c.e. sets that avoid the cone above a non-computable c.e. set; the length of agreement and Sacks' preservation strategy; consequences for the c.e. degrees.
- 4.1 Length of agreement
- 4.2 The construction
- 4.3 Verification
- 4.4 Consequences
- 4.5 Exercises
- 4.6 Notes and references